The line between human research, which generally is given oversight by Institutional Review Boards, and quality improvement (QI) practices, which generally are not, is blurry and troublesome.
A group of 21 medical ethicists, health planners and administrators considers the situation and its consequences and suggests a method to analyze and oversee the ethics of QI activities.
An editorial writer says that the degree of “scrutiny and oversight for an activity should vary, regardless of whether the activity is called QI or human subjects research,” and suggests an “oversight triage system” to decide what kind of review each activity requires.
- « Stomach Ulcer :: Sequential Therapy Beats Standard Therapy For Helicobacter Pylori infection
- Drug Safety :: US Government failed to protect Americans from dangerous prescription drugs »
Sub-editorHealth Care :: How to Use Quality Improvement Methods Ethically in Health Care
by Sub-editor ( Author at Spirit India )
Posted on April 17th, 2007 at 2:00 am.
Find more from SpiritIndia on: Health